Keeper vs My Wallet: Tonkeeper and MyTonWallet Compared

Searching for Tonkeeper vs MyTonWallet? Both products now have new names. Tonkeeper is Keeper, and MyTonWallet is My Wallet. The naming changes matter when you look for the official download or try to compare an older review with today's app. Keeper on the App Store, My Wallet's rebranding announcement.

For a useful comparison, start with your usual task: sending USDT, working across several networks, managing multiple accounts or connecting a hardware wallet. Both products cover more ground than their original TON-focused names suggest.

Sources: Keeper, My Wallet, My Wallet's Bitcoin release, Keeper hardware-wallet instructions, My Wallet's Ledger and gasless update.

Consider Keeper first if fee handling is the main frustration you want to solve. Its Battery model lets eligible transfers use prepaid charges instead of requiring the user to obtain the network's native asset for each supported operation. That changes how you pay a fee; it does not make the operation free. Keeper's explanation of fee options.

Check the transfer screen for your actual token and network. A feature working for USDT on one chain does not establish that it works for every asset on every chain. Keeper's TRON documentation, for example, distinguishes USDT fee options from other TRON tokens. Keeper on TRON.

Existing Tonkeeper users should also separate the rename from moving funds between wallet configurations. Keeper describes migration into a multichain wallet as an optional operation that can move assets and incur fees. Read the migration screen before confirming anything. Keeper migration guide.

Consider My Wallet first if your main job is organizing several accounts and understanding a portfolio. Its Portfolio 2.0 release describes allocation views, portfolio-value history and profit-and-loss views, alongside improvements to subwallet management. Those are relevant capabilities for someone who regularly needs to answer, “Which account holds this asset, and how has my allocation changed?” Portfolio 2.0.

The choice still depends on your workflow. A large feature list is useful only when the controls you need are easy to find on your device. Before moving a substantial balance, check receiving, sending, transaction history and account switching with a small amount. If you use a tablet or desktop, evaluate that version separately from the phone app.

A transfer and a swap involve different cost questions. For a transfer, inspect the network and fee payment method. For a swap, also compare the quoted output, route, any provider charge and the price impact shown before confirmation.

Use the same input asset, amount and destination network when checking both apps. A comparison between a TON transfer in one wallet and a cross-chain conversion in the other says little about which is cheaper for your task. Live quotes can also change between checks, so an evergreen article cannot promise a permanent fee winner.

Write down your three most common actions. Open both products from their official download pages and see which workflow fits those actions with less confusion. A good first evaluation might be: locate a receive address, inspect a transfer estimate, and find a completed transaction.

If you want to try the second wallet, creating a separate small test wallet avoids moving your main recovery phrase merely to inspect the interface. Hardware-wallet owners should use the documented connection flow for their device.

Our editorial starting point: explore Keeper for its Battery workflow; explore My Wallet for its portfolio and account-management tools. Make the final choice using your actual networks, device and transfer needs.

Find Keeper on TON App and browse the wallet directory for other options.